Chapter Seventeen

God’s Judgment of
Rome: Judgment of the Whore




17:1 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters:


After the seven vials of God’s wrath had been poured out, one of the angels bearing the vials came and spoke to John
.  His purpose was to show John more details about the papacy which he refers to here as “the great whore that sitteth upon many waters.”  The reason the woman is spoken of as a whore is that the papacy has been guilty of false worship and idolatry which is quite often referred to as fornication or adultery in the Bible.  The Children of Israel did the same thing.  Thou hast also taken thy fair jewels of my gold and of my silver, which I had given thee, and madest to thyself images of men, and didst commit whoredom with them” (Ezekiel 16:17).  The Catholics also practiced idolatry and other abominations which prompted God to call them “the great whore.”  The “many waters” which the woman is seen sitting upon will be explained in verse fifteen to be a multitude of people.  To sit on something means that it acts as a base or foundation.  The papacy could not exist without the support, financially and otherwise, from a great number of people around the world.  So all who have the mark of the beast and support the papacy are those upon which this whore sits.



17:2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.


For many centuries the papacy managed to get world leaders to submit to her.  These world leaders committed spiritual fornication with
Rome.  This term is often used in reference to idolatry and false worship which is exactly what was occurring in this instance.  The papacy had seduced these leaders into participating in her ungodly deeds.  This is why the papacy was referred to as a “great whore” in verse one.  She was willing to sell herself to the nations of the world for wealth, prestige, and power.


The inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.”  Not only were the leaders seduced, but the general populace as well.  They were duped into believing and following the false doctrines of the Catholics.  Their condition is likened here to drunkenness.  Rome had in essence, gotten them drunk and taken advantage of them, as an unscrupulous man will often try to do with a woman.  But the people were ultimately at fault, just as a woman will only find herself in that position if she gets drunk in the first place.  It was her decision to drink, therefore what happened to her was ultimately her responsibility.  Likewise, these people could have resisted the false doctrines that were given them to “drink” but they chose not to do so.  They are the ones who chose to drink, no one forced it on them.  And because of the weakness of the people and their leaders the papacy was able to dominate the entire Western world for over a millennium.



17:3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet colored beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.


The angel now carries John
 away into the wilderness where you expect to find wild beasts.  Here he shows John a very horrific beast that has seven heads and ten horns.  We were first introduced to this beast in chapter twelve, but will be given a clearer picture of him here in chapter seventeen.  Seated upon this beast was a woman.  We can tell immediately that this woman is not the one mentioned in chapter twelve.  That woman was righteous, while this one is sitting upon an evil beast which is “full of names of blasphemy.”  This is the same beast we saw in chapter thirteen and it was stated there that he was full of the names of blasphemy.  This shows that the seven powers which the heads represent behaved in a disrespectful and blasphemous manner towards God.  They persecuted His people and corrupted His worship.  They acted as though He did not even exist.  They showed absolutely no regard or respect for God.  The beast is said to be scarlet colored which may well be a reference to the blood of the righteous he has shed countless times throughout history.



17:4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet color, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:


Our attention is now turned to the woman riding upon the hideous beast.  The woman is described as being beautifully and richly attired.  She was wearing garments of purple and scarlet.  “Purple raiment was costly, and consequently its use was the privilege of the rich exclusively.  It was worn by persons of wealth and high official position, and especially by kings.  Indeed, it was a sign of royalty, and was put on Jesus
 in mockery of his claims.”[1]  “The color (scarlet) and the method of obtaining it were early known.  It was much used in the hangings of the tabernacle and in the high priest’s vestments.  It was employed in the ceremony attending the purification of the leper, and in the preparation of the water of separation.”[2]  From the first color we receive the impression of power and authority.  From the second we get the idea of religious meaning and significance.  Together we have a picture of the papacy with her great spiritual authority.


The woman was further adorned with “gold and precious stones and pearls.”  This is a further indication of her wealth.  At the height of its power the papacy was unbelievably wealthy.  Of course much of this wealth was obtained at the expense of her own people.  The woman also had a golden cup in her hand.  It was normal for royalty to drink from vessels of silver and gold so this also adds to her aura of power and wealth.  But in this cup was the “abominations and filthiness of her fornication.”  Everything we had seen to this point has pointed to a wonderful and wealthy woman, but here we see her true character.  She was similar in character to the scribes and Pharisees of Christ
’s day.  Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!  For ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.  Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also” (Matthew 23:25-6).  This woman appeared very beautiful and alluring from the outside, but inside she was rotten to the core.



17:5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY,
BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.


This beautifully attired woman had a name written on her forehead, a name that described her as she really was and betrayed her marvelous appearance.  Back in chapter ten, as preparation was being made for the pouring out of the seven vials of God’s wrath, which was to destroy the papacy, the statement was made “the mystery of God should be finished.”  The term mystery is applied to the apostate Roman Church
.  And indeed her origins and practices are mysterious, having no basis in scripture whatsoever.  At one time in history Babylon was a great and powerful city, and during the sixth century B.C. became the most powerful nation in the world after subduing Assyria.  But it was a city noted for idolatry and excess, and like Sodom and Gomorrah has become synonymous with great wickedness.  At the time Revelation was written Babylon was the most infamous city of the past.  Everyone knew of that city’s reputation for sin and wickedness.  Spiritual Rome has many similar characteristics thus leading to the comparison between the two.


THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.”  Today there are literally hundreds of groups practicing spiritual harlotry.  Groups that have splintered off from the Catholic
 Church because of ideological differences, but they too practice false doctrines of one type or another.  These are the so-called “denominations.”  The word denomination implies division, but the Lord’s Church is not divided.  These churches are also guilty of spiritual fornication like Rome and are in essence the daughters of Rome, which is where apostasy really first took hold and flourished.  So Rome is the mother of numerous spiritual harlots.


This woman’s name was written on her forehead where everyone should have been able to see it.  This denotes the fact that
Rome’s sins and apostasy were visible to the whole world.  The problem, however, is that the world did not want to see the truth of the matter.  They accepted the papacy and never questioned her authenticity.  Just as men are often blinded and taken in by the physical beauty of a woman, despite the fact that she might have a very objectionable character.  Eventually their blindness will be their downfall.


The entire world was exactly as Jesus
 described the Jews during His day “For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them” (Matthew 13:15).  Even today, most people fail to see the apostasy of Rome and her many spiritually immoral daughters, the denominations.  They remain blind to the truth and continue in their sins.



17:6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus
: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.


We have already seen that this woman is of very bad character.  Here we see just how bad she is.  She is said to be “drunken with the blood of the saints.”  Of course blood would not actually make a person drunk, but we are not talking about a literal woman anyway.  The thought is that this woman has slaughtered so many of Christ
’s servants that she did not just have a taste of their blood, but was a glutton.  She drank of the blood of the saints until she could not drink any more.


After having given us a description of this hideous woman, John
 now tells us how he reacted.  He “wondered with great admiration.”  This does not mean that he admired the woman in the way we would use the word today.  He wondered and marveled at this woman who was so richly attired, and yet was of such an evil character.  In short, John was amazed at what he saw, and did not fully understand the identity or meaning of this woman.



17:7 And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel?  I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.


The angel that is talking with John
 now asks him why he marveled or wondered after this woman and the grotesque beast upon which she was riding.  The angel then offers to tell John about these two evil creatures, which he proceeds to do in the next verse.



17:8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.


The seven headed beast is spoken of here as something that “was, and is not.”  This indicates that it has died.  This is further supported by the statement “and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition.”  The bottomless pit is where we saw the Arabs arise from in chapter nine.  It is the dwelling place of Satan and of all things which are evil.  Certainly, then, it is the place where this woman and the seven-headed beast came from.  The beast originally came from the pit but then was destroyed.  This is the meaning of the word perdition.  It comes from the Greek
 word “apoleia,” which Strong’s defines as “ruin or loss (physical, spiritual or eternal):-damnable (-nation), destruction, die, perdition, X perish, pernicious ways, waste.”[3]  Thus we see that this beast was killed, which refers to the overthrow of Rome in 476 by Odoacer.


The beast is now dead, but something very unexpected happened.  The beast was resurrected.  This is what is meant by the last phrase of the verse, “the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.”  This has reference to the revival of
Rome, which at one point seemed dead, but then suddenly came back to life in the form of the papacy.  Because of this seemingly miraculous occurrence “they that dwell on the earth shall wonder.”  People will be in awe of the remarkable recuperative powers of this beast.  This is the same thing we saw in chapter thirteen.  And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast” (Revelation 13:3).  But here we are told who exactly it was that wondered after the beast.  It was those “whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world.”  In other words, most people did wonder after the beast, but Christians did not.  Those who have their names written in the book of life are Christians.  This verse tells us that their names have been written there “from the foundation of the world.”  This does not teach predestination as some might think.  God has not chosen any particular person, but rather a type of people.  Those who are holy and righteous will be accepted of God.  This was decided before the world was ever created.  According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love” (Ephesians 1:4).


The reason Christians will not wonder after the beast is because they should understand what is going on.  They had these very same prophesies which we are presently studying to help them understand the events as they occurred.  Therefore there was no reason for them to wonder after the beast.



17:9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom.  The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.


The phrase “and here is the mind which hath wisdom,” is similar to the phrase in chapter thirteen “Here is wisdom.”  The idea is that a very important statement is about to be made, and careful attention should be paid to it.  The important message is that “the seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.”  The question is whether this is meant literally or figuratively.  The Lord has already put us on alert that something unusual is going on in this verse with the statement “here is the mind which hath wisdom.”


In prophesy mountains represent powerful nations and governments.  The seven heads of the beast are seven world empires which Satan has used as his instruments in an attempt to destroy God’s people.  The woman will be shown in verse eighteen to be
Rome.  She is in essence a close-up view of the seventh head, the head presently in power.  She rides upon the beast because she is the representative of the head currently in power, and she is the greatest accomplishment of Satan.  The papacy enjoyed more power, and for a longer time, than any other empire of any time in history.  But despite her unholy power and glory, she failed in her primary mission, the eradication of the Lord’s Church.


But here the seven heads also have another meaning.  It is pointing to the fact that this seventh head sits on seven literal mountains.  We already know that it is
Rome that we are dealing with here.  And indeed Rome fits with this description having long been known as the “City of Seven Hills.”  “These hills include the famous seven hills on which ancient Rome was built-the Aventine, Caelian, Capitoline, Esquiline, Palatine, Quirinal, and Viminal hills.”[4] Since there is a double meaning here the Lord alerted us to it beforehand so that we would not miss it, by saying, “here is the mind which hath wisdom.



17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.


The reference to seven kings here is not referring to seven individuals, but to seven thrones, which were each occupied by numerous men.  These kings stand for the seven kingdoms shown as mountains in the previous verse.  The Bible has often used the term king when actually referring to a kingdom.  A good example is found in Daniel chapter two.  There Daniel is interpreting Nebuchadnezzar
’s dream about a great image.  The image is divided up into four parts which represent the four kingdoms of Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome.  In describing the image to Nebuchadnezzar Daniel says this.  Thou, O king, art a king of kings: for the God of heaven hath given thee a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory.  And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them all.  Thou art this head of gold.  And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth” (Daniel 2:37-39).  He refers to king Nebuchadnezzar as the head of the image.  The other three parts are all referred to as kingdoms.  Here he is addressing Nebuchadnezzar but says “after thee shall arise another kingdom.”  Since Nebuchadnezzar was not the last king of the Babylonian Empire, Daniel has to be referring to the Empire and not Nebuchadnezzar personally.  This is what the Bible so often does, and is doing here in Revelation.


The seven kingdoms which are under consideration here are
Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome, and the papacy.  Five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come.”  At the time of John’s writing Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Mede-Persia, and Greece had already fallen.  Rome was then in power and the papacy was yet to come.  The last of the seven, the papacy, is supposed to “continue a short space” when it comes.  The term “short space” is from the Greek word “oligos.”  Strong’s definition includes “a season, short, small, a while.”[5]  This definition shows that the word can be interpreted as a season or a while.  This eliminates any possible difficulties over calling the duration of the papacy a “short” space.  The context of the verse indicates to us that we are not looking at the length of the time period, but simply the fact that this seventh kingdom is to have a period during which it is to enjoy great power.



17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.


Again we see the idea of a resurrected kingdom.  A kingdom “that was, and is not, even he is the eighth.”  How can their be an eighth when there are only seven heads?  Notice that it says the eighth “is of the seven.”  This refers us back to chapter thirteen where we saw the seven-headed beast and another beast that “had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.”  We identified this second beast as the
Holy Roman Empire.  The Holy Roman Empire is the eighth, but as can easily be seen it is of the seven.  It is the carnal resurrection of the old Roman Empire.  We also find that a similar fate awaits this eighth head as was promised the seven-headed beast.  It too will be destroyed by God’s vengeance.  It ended, interestingly enough, at the same time the papacy was receiving its death blows.

 

“The later emperors, all rulers of Austria and concerned mainly with aggrandizement of their personal dominions, were mere figureheads.  Futile armed intervention against the French Revolution constituted the last important venture of the empire in European politics.  Because of well-founded fears that Napoleon I, Emperor of France, intended to annex the imperial title, Francis II, the last of the emperors, formally dissolved the empire on Aug.  6, 1806, and established the Empire of Austria.”[6]



17:12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.


We are now told the meaning of the ten horns of the beast.  The horns represent ten kings.  As we saw in verse ten the term king is used to refer to a kingdom and not to individual rulers.  So the horns are actually ten kingdoms.  We see here that these kingdoms have not come into being as yet, but will receive power and work with the beast at some time in the future.  They will have “power as kings one hour with the beast.”  Here hour comes from the Greek
 word “hora,” which Strong’s defines as “an ‘hour’ (literally or figuratively):-day, hour, instant, season, X short, [even-] tide, (high) time.”[7]  This definition indicates that the meaning of this word does not have to be specific.  One meaning that is given is “season.”  This implies an indefinite period of time.  So we are not looking for a definite period of time for these kingdoms to have power with the beast.  Also, since the 1,260 year period is not mentioned here we can assume that these ten kingdoms will not exist throughout this entire period.  If they were to exist throughout that whole era we would almost certainly be told of this.


Back in chapter thirteen we introduced some related prophesies of Daniel.  One part of that prophesy in particular is very relevant to our discussion here.  And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings” (Daniel
7:24).  The fourth of the beasts which Daniel saw was a representation of Rome.  It had ten horns just as the seventh head of the seven-headed beast does.  The question now is this, are these ten horns the same in both cases?  In principle they are, but in practice they aren’t.  In both cases the ten horns are ten kingdoms which support the papacy.  But in Daniel we are looking at the beginning of the papacy, here in Revelation we are looking at the end of the papacy.


Notice how in Daniel’s prophesy the little horn is seen rising AFTER the first ten.  This shows us that these ten kingdoms were in existence in A.D. 533 when the papacy officially began.  Later in this chapter we will see that the ten horns we are currently dealing with are present at the end of the papacy’s power.  The problem is that not one single kingdom extant at the origin of the papacy survived until her demise.  So obviously we must be looking at two different groups of ten.  They serve the same purpose, they support the papacy, but the names will be different for the two sets.


The task of identifying the ten kingdoms spoken of here is not a particularly easy task.  The map of
Europe has undergone tremendous changes over the last 1,500 years.  Kingdoms have appeared and then disappeared, some to reappear later, others gone forever.  Our task is to find ten kingdoms that existed and supported the papacy throughout some part of the 1,260 years of her power, and then remained to turn against the papacy in the end.  The best way I know to approach this is to make a list of all the possible candidates and then look into each one and see if it fits what we are looking for.  There are six criteria which a kingdom must satisfy to be what we are looking for.  The criteria are as follows:

 

1.  It must be an independent or sovereign kingdom.  In other words it is not simply a province or colony of some greater power.


2.  It must possess at least a moderate measure of power.  Verse thirteen tells us that these nations “shall give their power and strength unto the beast.”  A kingdom which was extremely weak would have no power to give to the papacy.


3.  It must be a Catholic
 nation, that is, a nation which has Catholicism as its national religion and supports the papacy.


4.  The first three criteria must have all been met simultaneously during some part of the 1,260 year period of the papacy’s power.


5.  All ten nations must have existed at the same time.


6.  All of the nations must have remained in existence up to the time of the Reformation.  Verse sixteen tells us that “these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.”  So these ten nations will eventually begin to turn away from the papacy, and this did not happen until the Reformation.

 

One method of searching for kingdoms which meet these criteria is to examine the histories of present-day European nations.  We will restrict our search to Europe because after the eighth century Catholic power no longer existed in Asia or Africa for any extended periods of time due to the advance of the Arabs.  But how will looking at present-day Europe give us the information we desire about nations which existed hundreds of years ago?  The histories given in any encyclopedia will provide for us, among other things, the past history of the area of land which is presently occupied by that particular country.  So this way we will find information about the past of every inch of the European continent.  Even if a nation is of recent origin we will know who controlled the land in the past centuries.  This way we can discover what nations existed in Europe in the past.  As of 1991 there were thirty-three sovereign nations in Europe.  They are Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Vatican City, and Yugoslavia.[8]


Many of the nations on our list only came into existence in the last 200 years, which is too late for our purposes.  Others were not Catholic
 nations, but belonged to the Eastern Orthodox branch of Christendom and thus do not fit our criteria.  The following countries can therefore be removed from consideration because of one or both of these reasons: Albania, Andorra, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Switzerland, Turkey, Vatican City, and Yugoslavia.  This leaves Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden to be considered.  We will now examine the history of each of these countries in turn.



Austria

 

“During the 8th century, after fratricidal strife among the Germans, the Franks secured the throne of Bavaria.  Fighting continued during that century between the Avars and the Bavarians in the Danube R.  valley.  At the end of the century the Frankish emperor Charlemagne devastated the territory of the Avars and established a series of outposts (military districts) of the empire in the country between the Enns and Raab rivers to serve as buffer territories against future encroachment from the east.  One of these outposts was the Ostmark (Eastern March), which later became known as the Ost Reich (Eastern Country) or Österreich (Austria).


The Magyars, a nomadic people migrating slowly from the east, advanced easily along the Danube R.  valley until they were finally defeated by the German king Otto I at
Augsburg in 955 in the Battle of the Lechfeld.  Otto I revived the Eastern March and gave the more influential title of margrave to its administrator; these moves marked the emergence of Austria as a political entity.  The boundary of the Eastern March was slowly extended eastward until in the early 11th century it reached what is now called Moravia.  The margrave of Austria was subordinate to the duke of Bavaria, whose domain included this march.  The main function of the margrave was the defense of the march and the outlying areas, and for that purpose the margraves enjoyed exceptional power.  Between 976 and 1230 the Babenberg rulers of Austria contributed much to the growth of the march.  They built cities and roads, encouraged trade, and enhanced their prestige by participation in the Crusades.


The death of the last Babenberg was followed by a period of trial and unrest.  King Ottokar II (1230?-78) of
Bohemia occupied Austria, Styria, and Carniola.  His power was opposed by Rudolph von Hapsburg, who was crowned Holy Roman emperor in 1273.  In 1278 Ottokar was defeated in battle by Rudolf’s forces and slain.  By 1283 most of the former domain of Ottokar had come under the rule of Rudolf’s son Albert I (1250?-1308).


The rise of the house of Hapsburg is closely linked to the rise of
Austria.  During the 14th and 15th centuries the Hapsburgs steadily increased their holdings in the eastern part of the Holy Roman Empire.  With acquisition of the region surrounding the Brenner Pass, the Hapsburg holdings extended from the upper Danube to the upper Rhine and to the edge of the eastern Alps.  Between 1438 and 1806 the rulers of Austria, with one exception, also held the title of Holy Roman emperor.


The Austrian rulers enlarged their holdings by political agreements and by marriage.  It was said that while other states made war, it was the good fortune of
Austria to make marriages.  Flanders, Burgundy, Spain, Trieste, Styria, southern Tirol, and all the present Austrian provinces (with the exception of Salzburg which was governed by an archbishop) became Hapsburg possessions through marriage.  With the acquisition of the Netherlands through marriage in 1477, of the crown of Bohemia in 1526, and the crown of Hungary in 1527, The Hapsburgs made Austria the center of a vast empire.”[9]

 

From this we can see that Austria seems to be exactly what we are looking for.  It was a very strong independent nation, and definitely supported Catholicism.  So Austria is the first horn.



Denmark

 

“About A.D. 950, all Denmark was united by King Harald Bluetooth.  Harald introduced Christianity in Denmark.  About 800, Danish seamen began raiding European coastal towns and sailing away with slaves and treasure.  The Danish Vikings spread terror throughout much of Western Europe for about 300 years.  They conquered England in 1013, and Danish kings ruled that country until 1042.


During the late 1100’s and early 1200’s, Danish power expanded along the southern coast of the
Baltic sea to Estonia, which Denmark conquered in 1219.  But a long period of civil wars and struggles with north German cities, beginning in the 1240’s, greatly weakened the country.


Denmark regained its power under Queen Margrete, who became ruler in 1375.  Margrete was also the wife of King Haakon VI of Norway.  After he died in 1380, Margrete became ruler of Norway as well as Denmark.  In 1388, during political confusion in Sweden, Swedish noblemen elected her ruler of Sweden, too.  In 1397, Margrete united Denmark, Norway, and Sweden in the union of Kalmar, with power centered in Denmark.  Sweden broke away from the union in 1523.


In 1536, during the Reformation, King Christian III established Lutheranism as the official religion of
Denmark.  That same year Christian made Norway a province of Denmark.”[10]

 

Denmark also meets our requirements.  It was a powerful nation which practiced Catholicism up until the Reformation.  Therefore Denmark is our second horn.



Finland

 

“In the 1000’s, Sweden and Russia began a struggle for control of Finland.  Both nations wanted to extend their boundaries.  In addition, Sweden wanted to convert the Finns to Roman Catholicism, and Russia wanted to convert them to Eastern Orthodoxy.


During the 1100’s and 1200’s,
Sweden gradually conquered all Finland and established Roman Catholicism as the official religion.  Many Swedes settled in Finland, and Swedish became the official language.  However, Finns shared equal rights with Swedes.  About 1540, the Swedish king made Lutheranism the official religion.”[11]

 

From this we can see that Finland does not meet our criteria.  Although Catholicism was the predominant religion, Finland never really existed as an independent sovereign nation after it was converted to Catholicism.  It was a pawn in the struggle between Sweden and Russia.  Therefore Finland is not one of our horns.



France

 

“By the mid-600’s, the Merovingian kings had become weak rulers, interested chiefly in personal pleasures.  Pepin the Herstal, the chief royal advisor, gradually took over most of the royal powers.  His son, Charles Martel, extended the family’s power.  Charles received the title Martel (the Hammer) after defeating an invading Arab army in 732.  The battle began near Tours and ended near Poiters.  He became king of the Franks in all but title.


Charles Martel’s son, Pepin the Short, overthrew the last Merovingian ruler and became king of the Franks in 751.  He founded the Carolingian dynasty, and enlarged the Frankish kingdom.  He also helped develop the political power of the pope by giving Pope Stephen II a large gift of land north of
Rome.


Pepin’s son, Charlemagne, was one of the mightiest conquerors of all time.  After Charlemagne became king of the Franks, he went on over fifty military campaigns and expanded his kingdom far beyond the borders of what is now
France.  He also extended the pope’s lands.  In 800 Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne Emperor of the Romans.


Charlemagne died in 814, and his three grandsons later fought among themselves for control of his huge empire.  They divided it into three kingdoms in 843.  In the Treaty of Verdun, one grandson, Charles the Bald, received most of what is now
France.  The second kingdom consisted of much that is now Germany.  The third kingdom lay between the other two.  It consisted of a strip of land extending from the North Sea to central Italy.


By the late 900’s, the Carolingian kings had lost much power, and the strength of the nobles had increased.  The kings became little more than feudal lords chosen by the other feudal nobles to lead them in war.  But in peacetime, most of their authority extended only over their personal estates.  In 987, the nobles ended the Carolingian line of kings and chose Hugh Capet as their king.  He started the Capetian dynasty.  Many historians mark the beginning of the French nation from the coronation of Hugh Capet.”
[12]

 

This shows the beginnings of the French nation.  France remained an independent and Catholic nation until the French Revolution in 1789.  From this we see that France does meet our criteria.  Therefore France is our third horn.



Germany

 

“In 843, the Treaty of Verdun divided Charlemagne’s empire into three kingdoms, one for each of his grandsons.  Louis II (called the German) received lands east of the Rhine River.  His kingdom became what is now Germany.  The western part, later called France, went to Charles I (the Bald).  Lothair I received the middle kingdom, a narrow strip that extended from the North Sea to central Italy.  He also kept the title of emperor.


In 911, The German branch of the Frankish royal family died out.  By then, the German kingdom consisted of five powerful duchies (territories ruled by a duke)-
Bavaria, Lorraine, Franconia, Saxony, and Swabia.  The German dukes elected Conrad I of Franconia as king.  In 919, Conrad was followed by Henry I (the Fowler) of Saxony, whose family ruled until 1024.  With the founding of the Saxon dynasty, Germany became permanently separated from France.


Henry’s son, Otto I (the Great), drove invading Hungarians out of southern
Germany in 955, and extended the German frontier in the North.  Otto also won control over the old middle Frankish kingdom, which gave him the right to claim the title of emperor.  In 962, Otto was crowned emperor of Rome.  This marked the beginning of what later was called the Holy Roman Empire.”[13]

 

Germany remained part of the Holy Roman Empire until Napoleon seized most of its territory in the early nineteenth century.  His conquests brought about the official end of the Empire in 1806.  So from 962 to 1806 Germany was not an independent nation.  It was part of the Holy Roman Empire, and in reality part of Austria.  Catholicism was the dominant religion of this region, but since Germany was not an independent nation it fails to meet our criteria.  Therefore Germany is not one of our horns.



Great Britain


Great Britain as a nation did not actually exist until 1707.  That is when England, Scotland, and Wales united to form Great Britain.  In 1801 Northern Ireland joined Great Britain to form the United Kingdom.  Before all of this came about the area was generally referred to as England.  We will now examine the history of England in the centuries before it became Great Britain.


Groups known as the Angles and Saxons invaded
England in the fifth century as soon as Rome had withdrawn its last legions.  They subdued most of the Britons and were able to fend off the Scots and Danes for the most part.  They formed a strong central government which helped to unify the country.  For several centuries England was ruled as a monarchy by Saxon kings.  In 1066, after Edward the Confessor died without leaving a direct heir, a French nobleman, William, Duke of Normandy, claimed the throne and invaded England.  William’s conquest was successful and he became the king of England.  As time passed the Normans and Anglo-Saxons assimilated into one culture.  Christianity had been introduced to England by Roman soldiers long before the Angles and Saxons ever arrived.  But Christianity did not become the predominant religion of England until missionary efforts were undertaken by the Catholic Church in the sixth century.  England remained a Catholic nation until 1534.[14]


From this we can see that
England was indeed a strong and sovereign nation which practiced Catholicism.  Thus it fits our criteria, and is horn number four.



Hungary

 

“The history of the Hungarian state began in the late 800’s.  At that time tribes of Magyars swept from the east into the middle Danube basin—the great lowland region bordering the Danube River that comprises most of present-day Hungary.  The tribes were led by a chief named Árpád.  As the Magyars advanced into the area, they began to establish settlements.


During the early 900’s, Magyar armies looted towns throughout much of
Europe.  But in 955, the German king Otto I defeated the invading Magyars.  The Magyars then ended their raids.


About 970, Árpád’s great-grandson Géza became leader of the Magyars.  Géza began to organize the various Magyar tribes into a united nation.  After Géza died, his son, Stephen, carried on the work.  Stephen, who was a Roman Catholic
, asked Pope Sylvester II to give him the title king of Hungary.  The pope agreed, and Stephen I, Hungary’s first king, was crowned in 1000.  As king, Stephen made Roman Catholicism the country’s official religion.  For this work, the Catholic Church declared him a saint in 1083, 45 years after his death.  As a result of Stephen’s reign, Hungary became closely identified with the culture and politics of Western Europe.


Árpád’s descendants ruled
Hungary until 1301, when the last Árpád king died without an heir.  During the 300 years of the Árpáds’ reign, Hungary became firmly established as a Christian state.  After the death of the last Árpád king in 1301, Hungary remained an independent kingdom for 225 more years.”[15]

 

In 1526 Hungary was defeated by the Ottoman Turks, and the eastern and southern parts of the country were occupied by the Turks.  In the 1600’s Austria pushed the Turks out of Hungary and took control of the country.  Austria retained the land until 1918 when, after the defeat of Austria-Hungary in WWI, the two were separated and the Republic of Hungary was established.


This shows us that
Hungary was a strong independent nation for centuries.  It was the easternmost nation which adopted Catholicism as its official religion.  So Hungary meets our criteria, and is our fifth horn.



Italy

 

“In 476, Odoacer seized power in Italy.  He ruled well for 13 years.  Then he was attacked and defeated by Theodoric, the king of another Germanic tribe, the Ostrogoths.  Theodoric and Odoacer ruled jointly until 493, when Theodoric murdered Odoacer.  Theodoric continued to rule Italy with an army of Ostrogoths and a government that was mostly Italian.  He brought peace to the country, but after his death in 526, the kingdom began to grow weak.  By 533, Justinian, the Byzantine emperor who ruled the eastern part of the Roman Empire, expelled the Ostrogoths.  The old Roman Empire was united again.  But Byzantine rule in Italy collapsed by 572 as a result of invasions by another Germanic tribe, the Lombards.


During the 400’s and 500’s, the popes increased their influence in both religious and political matters in
Italy.  It was usually the popes who led attempts to protect Italy from invasion or to soften foreign rule.  For about 200 years the popes opposed attempts by the Lombards, a Germanic tribe which had captured most of Italy, to take over Rome as well.  The popes finally defeated the Lombards with the aid of two Frankish kings, Pepin the Short and Charlemagne.  In 800 Charlemagne was crowned emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III.  The popes established their own political rule in what were called the Papal States in central Italy.


After Charlemagne’s death in 814, his son Louis I succeeded him.  Louis divided the empire among his sons, who fought each other for control of more territory.  Battles for control of
Italy continued until Otto the Great, the king of Germany, became Holy Roman Emperor in 962.


From the 1000’s on, Italian cities began to grow rapidly in independence and importance.  They became centers of political life, banking, and foreign trade.  Some cities became wealthy, and many including
Florence, Genoa, Milan, Pisa, and Venice, grew into almost independent city-states.  Each had its own foreign policy and developed its own political life.  They all resisted the efforts of noblemen and emperors to control them.  During the 1300’s and 1400’s, some Italian city-states ranked among the most important powers of Europe.


In 1519, King Charles I of
Spain, a member of the Habsburg family, became Emperor Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire.  The power of Charles V lay chiefly in the riches of the lands under Spanish control.  In 1521, a war over rival claims of territory broke out between Spain and France.  Spanish troops looted Rome in 1527, and later took Milan and Sicily from France.  By 1559, almost all of Italy was under the influence of Spain.  Ferdinand I, Charles’s brother succeeded Charles in 1556, and the title of emperor passed from the Spanish Habsburgs to the Austrian Habsburgs.  Spain gradually lost power in Europe and, by the early 1700’s control of Italy had passed from Spain to Austria.  During the 1700’s Austria governed Milan and controlled most of the rest of Italy through local rulers who were loyal to the Austrian king.”[16]

 

From this we can see that the territory which is today known as Italy never contained an independent nation.  The central third was more or less controlled by the popes.  The northern third was controlled by France, Spain, and then Austria.  The southern third was composed of independent city-states for several centuries, but eventually fell under the sway of France, Spain, and Austria successively.  Although this region contained the seat of Roman Catholicism, there was never an independent kingdom located there.  Thus Italy fails to meet our criteria, and is not one of our horns.



The
Netherlands

 

“During the 400’s, Germanic peoples called the Franks drove the Romans out of the Low Countries.  The Frankish kingdom expanded, but broke apart during the 800’s.  In 870, the Low Countries were divided between the East and West Frankish kingdoms (later Germany and France).  The northern part, including what is now The Netherlands, became part of the East Frankish kingdom.


At first, the French and German rulers of the
Low Countries paid little attention to the region.  Local dukes, counts, and bishops became increasingly powerful.  But during the 1100’s, trade and industry began to expand rapidly in the Low Countries.  Fishing, shipbuilding, shipping, and textile manufacturing became especially important.  The French and German kings became interested in the Low Countries after the thriving trade developed.  The towns, which wanted to stay free, supported the local nobles in struggles against the foreign rulers.


Beginning in the 1300’s, the French dukes of
Burgundy won control of most of the Low Countries through inheritance, marriage, purchase, and war.  They promoted central government in the Low Countries, and political and national unity began to develop.


In 1516, Duke Charles of
Burgundy also became king of Spain.  In this way, the Low Countries came under Spanish control.  Charles became archduke of Austria and emperor of the Holy Roman Empire in 1519.  Beginning in 1520, Charles further strengthened the central government of the Low Countries.


During the early 1500’s, the Protestant movement called the Reformation spread through the
Low Countries.  Charles tried to stop this threat to Roman Catholicism by persecuting Protestants.  His son, Philip II of Spain, inherited the Low Countries in 1555.  Philip stepped up the struggle against Protestants, and tried to take complete power over the Low Countries.  In 1568, the nobles there revolted against his harsh rule.  They were led by William I (called the Silent), prince of Orange.


The Spanish troops were generally successful in land battles, but the rebels’ ships controlled the sea.  The Spaniards attacked
Leiden in 1573, but the city held out bravely.  In 1574, the people opened dikes that held back the sea, and a Dutch fleet sailed over the flood waters to rescue Leiden from the Spaniards.


By 1579, the revolt had started to break apart.  Roman Catholic
 nobles in the southern provinces of the Low Countries (now Belgium) had become dissatisfied and returned to Spanish control.  Protestantism was strongest in the northern provinces (now The Netherlands).  In 1579, most of the provinces formed the Union of Utretch and pledged to continue the revolt.


On
July 26, 1581, the northern provinces declared their independence from Spain, beginning what later became known as the Dutch Republic or The Netherlands.  The Dutch fought for their freedom until 1648, except for a temporary peace from 1609 to 1621.  Spain finally recognized Dutch independence in 1648.”[17]

 

From this we can see that by the time The Netherlands finally achieved their independence from Spain, they had already revolted against Catholicism and adopted Protestantism.  Therefore The Netherlands do not meet our requirements, and are not one of our horns.



Norway

 

“Viking sea raiders from the Norwegian communities spread terror through much of western Europe for about 300 years.  Beginning with the British Isles about A.D. 800, they attacked coastal towns and sailed away with slaves and treasure.  The Vikings also sailed west and established colonies in the Faero Islands and other North Atlantic islands.  About 870, they explored further west and colonized Iceland.  Eric the Red brought the first group of settlers to Greenland about 985.  About 1000, his son, Leif Ericson, led what is believed to have been the first voyage of Europeans to the mainland of America.


About 900, much of present-day
Norway was united under Norway’s first king, Harold I (called Fairhair), or Harald I.  He defeated many local chieftains and kings, and others recognized his leadership.  King Olav I introduced Christianity to Norway during the 990’s.  During the early 1000’s, Olav II achieved full Norwegian unity and firmly established Christianity.  He became Norway’s patron saint in 1031.


The Viking period ended during the late 1000’s.  The church grew in power, foreign trade expanded, and religious and trading centers became important cities.  Political confusion and struggles for royal power also developed.  Beginning in 1130, many regional leaders claimed the throne.  They were defeated in a series of civil wars that lasted until 1240.  Peace was restored under Haakon IV.  By 1300,
Norway’s economy was largely controlled by north German merchants.  Norway had become dependent on them for grain imports.  The country was weakened further in 1349 and 1350, when about half the Norwegian people died in an epidemic of bubonic plague.


Margrete, the wife of King Haakon VI of
Norway, was also the daughter of the king of Denmark.  After her father died in 1375, she became the Danish ruler.  Haakon died in 1380, and Margrete became ruler of Norway as well.  In 1388, during political confusion in Sweden, Swedish noblemen elected her to rule that country, too.  In 1397, in the Union of Kalmar, Margrete united Norway, Denmark, and Sweden, with power centered in Denmark.  Sweden revolted against the Danish rule several times, and broke away from the union in 1523.


Under the Danish-controlled union,
Norway grew weaker and Denmark grew stronger.  In 1536 Denmark declared Norway a Danish province and made Lutheranism the official Norwegian religion.”[18]

 

From this we can see that Norway was a strong Catholic nation until the time of the Reformation.  In the first half of the sixteenth century all three Scandinavian countries, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden switched from Catholicism to Protestantism.  Norway was an independent nation until this time, although it was part of a union with Denmark and Sweden.  Thus Norway does meet our criteria, and is our sixth horn.



Poland

 

“Members of the Piast family became the first rulers of Poland.  By the mid-900’s, Prince Mieszko I ruled over most of the land along the Vistula and Oder rivers.  His son, Bolesław I, conquered parts of what are now Czechoslovakia, East Germany, and Russia.  In 1025, Bolesław was crowned the first king of Poland.  After his death later that year, Poland went through periods of warfare and disunity.  By the mid-1100’s, it had broken up, into several sections, each ruled by a different noble.


During the 1200’s, various peoples invaded and conquered parts of
Poland.  Most of the country was finally reunified in the 1300’s.  Casimir the Great, the last Piast monarch, ruled Poland from 1333 to 1370.  Casimir formed a strong central government, strengthened the economy of the country and encouraged cultural development.


In 1386, Queen Jadwiga of
Poland married Władysław Jagiełło, the Grand Duke of Lithuania.  Jagiełło ruled both Poland and Lithuania as king, but each country remained largely self-governing.


Jagiellonian kings ruled
Poland for nearly 200 years.  Under their leadership, Poland expanded its territory and made important advances in its cultural, economic, and political development.  The Polish Empire reached its height during the 1500’s, when it covered a large part of central Europe, including the Ukraine and other Russian lands.


In spite of the advances of the Jagiellonian period, signs of strain developed after the mid-1500’s.  The monarchy began to lose power to the nobles, who dominated the parliament.  After the death of the last Jagiellonian monarch in 1572, Polish kings were elected by the nobles.  Some of the elected kings were foreigners, who proved to be ineffective rulers.  Rivalries among the nobles weakened the parliament, and costly wars ruined the economy.


Poland lost much of its territory in the Ukraine as a result of a rebellion there in 1648.  In 1655, Sweden won control over most of Poland’s Baltic provinces.  A series of wars with Turkey finally ended with a Polish victory at the Battle of Vienna in 1683.”[19]


“The Poles adopted Christianity in A.D. 966.  Throughout their history, they remained loyal to the Roman Catholic
 Church, though people in neighboring countries practiced Protestant or Eastern Orthodox religions.”[20]

 

From this we can easily see that Poland meets our requirements.  It was a very strong power for many centuries, and was an adamant supporter of Catholicism.  Thus Poland is our seventh horn.



Portugal

 

“Germanic tribes swept across the West Roman Empire in the A.D. 400’s, and helped bring about its collapse in 476.  The Visigoths, one of the tribes, conquered the Iberian Peninsula.  The Visigoths were Christians, and Portugal remained a Christian land under their rule.


In the early 700’s, North African Muslims conquered most of what are now
Portugal and Spain.  They influenced Portuguese civilization in many ways.  They constructed Arab-style buildings, introduced new crops, and improved education and the system of roads.


Many Christians of the
Iberian Peninsula opposed Muslim rule.  Christian opposition was especially strong in the north.  The Christians struggled to retake their lands for hundreds of years.  In the 1000’s, they gained the upper hand.  By the mid-1200’s, the Christians had driven the Muslims from Portugal and from most of Spain.


Henry of Burgundy, a French nobleman, had joined the Iberian Christians in their fight against the Muslims.  In 1094, Alfonso VI, a Christian king of
Spain, rewarded Henry with the counties of Porto and Coimbra, in what is now northern Portugal.  Alfonso named Henry the Count of Portugal.  Portugal was then considered a part of Spain.


Henry of Burgundy’s son, Alfonso Henriques, won many victories over the Muslims.  In 1143, he took the title king of
Portugal, and established Portugal as a kingdom independent from Spain.


In 1385, a new royal line, the House of Aviz, came to the Portuguese throne.  King John
 I became the first Aviz king.  His armies defeated Spanish forces and helped guarantee the future independence of Portugal from its powerful neighbor to the east.  King John also made an alliance with England.  This alliance, still in force, is the oldest existing political alliance in Europe.”[21]

 

From this we see that once Portugal broke away from Spain in 1143 it was an independent nation.  And since Catholicism was the national religion of Portugal it fulfills our requirements.  Thus Portugal is our eighth horn.



Spain

 

“During the 400’s, invading Germanic tribes swept across the West Roman Empire and helped bring about its collapse in 476.  One tribe, the Visigoths, invaded Spain and conquered the entire peninsula by 573.  The Visigoths set up a monarchy in Spain that was the first separate and independent government to rule the entire peninsula.  The Visigoths, who were Christians, tried to establish a civilization like that of the Romans.  But continued fighting among the Visigoth nobles and repeated revolts of the nobles against the kings weakened the nation.


The Visigoths ruled
Spain until the early 700’s, when Moors from northern Africa invaded the country.  The invasion began in 711, and the Moors conquered almost all the Visigoth kingdom by 718.  Only the narrow mountainous region across far northern Spain remained free of Moorish rule.


The Moorish government of
Spain collapsed during the early 1000’s because of fighting among groups of Moors.  The country then split into many small Moorish states and independent cities.


Groups of Visigoths and other Christians in far northern
Spain remained independent following the Moorish conquest.  These groups formed a series of kingdoms that extended from Spain’s northwest coast to the Mediterranean Sea.  During the 1000’s, these kingdoms began to expand and push the Moors southward.


By the late 1200’s, the Muslim territory in
Spain had been reduced to the Kingdom of Granada in the south.  The Christian kingdoms of Aragon, Navarre, and Castille controlled the rest of what is now Spain.  In 1469, Prince Ferdinand of Aragon married Princess Isabella of Castile.  Isabella became queen of Castile in 1474, and Ferdinand became king of Aragon in 1479.  Almost all of what is now Spain thus came under their rule.


In 1516, a grandson of Ferdinand and Isabella became King Charles I of
Spain.  Charles had ruled the Low Countries (what are now Belgium, Luxembourg, and The Netherlands), and he brought these lands into the Spanish kingdom.  The Spanish Empire reached its height during the reign of Charles’s son, Philip II, who became king in 1556.”[22]

 

This shows that Spain was a very important Catholic power for centuries.  Therefore Spain also meets our criteria and is our ninth horn.



Sweden

 

“Beginning about A.D. 800, Scandinavian adventurers called Vikings sailed to many parts of the world.  They acquired wealth by trade and conquest.  Most of the Norwegian and Danish Vikings sailed Westward.  The Swedish Vikings went eastward across Russia, as far as the Black and Caspian seas.  The Swedes traded slaves and furs for gold, silver, and luxury goods.  The Viking expeditions lasted until the 1000’s.  Much of Sweden’s trade with the east then came into the hands of German merchants, who settled in the town of Visby on the island of Gotland.


Christianity was first preached in
Sweden in A.D. 829 by Saint Anskar, a Frankish monk.  His missionary work began a struggle between Christianity and paganism that lasted about 200 years.  The first Christian king of Sweden was Olof Skotkonung, who ruled from the late 900’s until the early 1000’s.  Christianity brought about great changes in Sweden.  The clergy founded schools, encouraged the arts, and set down Sweden’s laws in writing.


By the 1000’s,
Sweden, Denmark, and Norway had become separate kingdoms.  Sweden began to develop along partly feudal lines.  There were three social classes-the clergy, the nobles, and the peasants.  Above them was the king, who was elected by the provincial lawmaking assemblies.  In 1249, Sweden conquered much of Finland.


During the 1200’s and 1300’s, constant struggles took place between the rulers of
Sweden and the nobles.  In 1388, to oppose the growing German influence in Sweden’s affairs, the nobles turned for help to Queen Margrete of Denmark and Norway.  The Germans were defeated in 1389, and the three Scandinavian countries were united under Margrete in 1397.  A treaty called the Union of Kalmar laid down the conditions of the union between the three countries.  This treaty provided for a common foreign policy, but separate national councils and the continuation of existing laws in each country.  Except for a few short periods of separation, the union lasted over 100 years.


Under the influence of German merchants,
Sweden’s economy developed considerably during the 1200’s and 1300’s.  These merchants developed Sweden’s mineral resources and controlled Swedish trade.  Plague wiped out a large part of Sweden’s population in 1350, and caused an economic decline.  The German merchants, with their powerful association called the Hanseatic League, increased their control of Swedish trade.


During the late 1400’s, the Riksdag (parliament) developed into a lawmaking and tax-raising body.  Members of a new social class, the merchants, joined the other three classes as members of the Riksdag.


The union with
Norway and Denmark continued throughout most of the 1400’s.  But many struggles took place between supporters and opponents of the union.  Gustavus Vasa, A Swedish noble, finally broke away from the union in 1523 after defeating the Danes.  He became king Gustavus I of independent Sweden that year.  Norway remained under Danish rule.


Gustavus encouraged the followers of Martin Luther, the German religious reformer, to spread their ideas.  About 1540, the Lutheran religion became the state religion of
Sweden.  Gustavus also increased the power of the throne and laid the foundations of the modern Swedish state.  He centralized the administration, dealt harshly with revolts, built an efficient army, and encouraged trade and industry.”[23]

 

From this we can see that Sweden was a powerful nation for centuries.  Even during the time when it was part of the union with Denmark and Norway it retained its individuality as a nation.  And until 1540 it was a Catholic nation.  So, like the other two Scandinavian countries, Denmark and Norway, Sweden meets our criteria, and is our tenth and final horn.


We have just examined the histories of the following countries:
Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden.  There were four which failed to meet our criteria and were rejected.  They were Finland, Germany, Italy, and The Netherlands.  This leaves us with Austria, Denmark, France, Great Britain, Hungary, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden, which did meet our criteria.  This is exactly ten nations as the Bible told us there would be.


We can now determine from the histories we have just seen the exact period covered by these ten kingdoms.  Table VIII is a list of the ten kingdoms with the dates that they became important Catholic
 nations, and the dates when they either ceased to exist or denounced Catholicism.

 

The Ten Horns of Revelation

Country

Begins

Ends

Austria

955

1806

Denmark

950

1536

England

843

1534

France

1066

1789

Hungary

1000

1526

Norway

1000

1536

Poland

1025

1795

Portugal

1143

1795

Spain

1050

1978

Sweden

1000

1540

Table VIII

 

This shows a period of 383 years (1143-1526) when all ten of the kingdoms existed simultaneously at catholic powers.  As is to be expected the highest point of the papacy occurred during this period of time.

 

“Innocent III became pope in 1198.  Under Innocent, papal influence over public life in Christian Europe reached its peak.  He was feudal lord over much of Europe, and he was a great administrator and jurist.”[24]


“During the pontificate of Innocent III, from 1198 to 1216, nearly every European ruler submitted to the power and authority of the Church
.”[25]

 

We can clearly see the fulfillment of this prophesy in these ten nations.  They upheld the papacy and lifted her to her greatest heights.



17:13 These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.


These ten kingdoms are said to “have one mind” which means they will be in agreement.  All ten of the nations we found had Roman Catholicism as their national religions.  They all gave “their power and strength unto the beast.”  These ten nations aligned themselves with the papacy and gave their economic, political, and military strength to her.  The primary reason why so many kings chose to go along with the papacy is that it bolstered their own positions.  The papacy supported the idea of monarchical government, which is not surprising since it is one itself.  The kings could, and often did, claim that their position was ordained of God.  The popes would sustain their claims and in turn the kings would support the popes.  Obviously there was more to it than this, but the whole situation revolved around the fact that both sides were profiting from the arrangement.



17:14 These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.


During the time when all of these nations were Catholic
 they joined the papacy in persecuting Christians.  Whether or not the kings really wanted to join the pope in his efforts to stamp out heresy was immaterial.  The pope would force the kings to do his bidding or else seek their overthrow in favor of a more agreeable sovereign.  Thus the kings of Europe joined the papacy in making “war with the lamb.”

 

“The Church thus undertook to coerce the sovereign to persecution.  It would not listen to mercy, it would not hear of expediency.  The monarch held his crown by the tenure of extirpating heresy, of seeing that the laws were sharp and that they were pitilessly enforced.  Any hesitation was visited with excommunication, and if this proved inefficacious, his dominions were thrown open to the first hardy adventurer whom the Church would supply with an army for his overthrow.


It was applied from the highest to the lowest, and the Church
 made every dignitary feel that his station was an office in a universal theocracy wherein all interests were subordinate to the great duty of maintaining the purity of the faith.  The hegemony of Europe was vested in the Holy Roman Empire, and its coronation was a solemnly religious ceremony in which the emperor was admitted to the lower orders of the priesthood, and was made to anathematize all heresy raising itself against the holy Catholic Church.  In handing him the ring, the pope told him that it was a symbol that he was to destroy heresy; and in girding him with the sword, that with it he was to strike down the enemies of the Church.  Frederic II declared that he had received the imperial dignity for the maintenance and propagation of the faith.  Every prince and noble was made to understand that his lands would be exposed to the spoiler if, after due notice, he hesitated in trampling out heresy.”[26]

 

We can see the arrangement that the papacy had for dealing with those who were in opposition to their teachings and practices.  It was literally a war with the Lord’s Church.  Obviously, many who held false beliefs, yet differed with Rome, were persecuted during this time.  In fact, most of those who were persecuted were not following the Bible pattern.  Rome could care less what someone’s beliefs were, if they were not in line with official Roman doctrine persecution was swift and merciless.  Although Rome didn’t care who they persecuted, their master did.  Satan wanted to destroy the remnants of the Lord’s Church.  But this was a war that Rome and their master were destined to lose.  The Lord and His Church cannot be defeated.  Christ ISLord of lords, and King of kings.”


They that are with him,” refers to Christ
’s people.  They are “with” him in that they are on his side in this great struggle between Christ and Satan.  They are referred to as “called, and chosen, and faithful.”  God has called everyone to respond to His love and mercy and to become part of His family.  Many people do actually respond to this call.  But most of those who do respond are not worthy, and are therefore not chosen of God.  For many are called, but few are chosen” (Matthew 22:14).  And of those who are chosen many become unfaithful.  The Lord requires faithfulness to the ultimate end, death.  be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life” (Revelation 2:10).  So those who are with the Lord can correctly be referred to as “called, and chosen, and faithful.” These people cannot be defeated by Satan because they have yielded themselves to God, and therefore are protected by His power.



17:15 And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.


When the woman was first introduced in verse one of this chapter she was referred to as “the great whore that sitteth upon many waters.”  The “many waters” are now explained to be a great multitude of people.  This has reference to the papacy’s involvement with and power over many different nations throughout
Europe.  By the year 1200 nearly all of Europe was Catholic and willingly submitted to the power of the pope.  There were tens of millions of people in Europe at that time and the vast majority freely accepted Catholicism, and most of the rest pretended to accept it in order to escape persecution.  This is where the true power of the popes lay.  As long as most of the people in a nation wanted Catholicism as the official religion, only a foolhardy king would try to rock the boat.  To struggle against the Church was to struggle against deeply held beliefs of the people.  This would only destabilize his kingdom.  No wise ruler wanted this, so consequently the popes had a much easier time of controlling the kings since the general populous was Catholic.  This is why we are now given the illustration of the great whore sitting upon many waters.  The papacy sat upon the multitudes of Europe.  They were the true strength and foundation of this evil and ungodly force.



17:16 And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.


The ten kingdoms which we identified in verse twelve are here seen to turn against the papacy.  These shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.”  This indicates not only an abandonment of the papacy, but also an active campaign against Catholicism.  To say that they will “hate the whore” shows that their actions will not simply be what they feel to be expedient, but will be the result of genuine hatred toward the papacy.  Since the papacy continually tried to meddle in the political affairs of other nations it is no wonder that bad feelings would have developed.


They will also “make her desolate and naked.”  This shows that they will strip the papacy of much of her power, prestige, and wealth.  They will “eat her flesh” shows that their attitude will be like that of a vicious predator attacking its prey.  These nations will turn against the papacy and attempt to ferociously destroy her.  Burn her with fire” reiterates the desire of these nations to utterly and completely destroy the papacy; nothing destroys as completely as fire.


We are told that they will hate the papacy, but we are not told why.  But this can be easily deduced.  The Reformation marked the time when the multitudes which we saw in the previous verse began to slowly turn away from Catholicism.  As this happened the kings had less incentive to remain loyal to the pope.  By 1550 half of the ten kingdoms which had supported the papacy in the past were gone.  Four had converted to Protestantism and one had been swallowed up by an invading army.  Denmark, England, Norway, and Sweden all rejected Catholicism and fell from the ranks of the pope’s supporters, and Hungary was overrun by the Ottoman Turks.  These five had all left within a short period of fourteen years.  This was a swift and decisive blow against the papacy.  It was a great erosion of the foundation of the power of the papacy.  It would still be some 250 years before the actual death-blow would be struck, but this period was definitely the beginning of the end of the papacy’s power.  By the early nineteenth century the pope had lost nearly all of his political and military support.  One by one each of the ten kingdoms deserted the papacy.  We will now examine each of these in detail.



Austria

 

“In 1517, Martin Luther, a German monk, began to attack many teachings and practices of the Roman Catholic Church.  Nobles, peasants, and townspeople joined this protestant movement, called the Reformation, and it spread quickly.  Some princes were sincere reformers, but others became Protestants only to gain church property.  Many peasants hoped the movement would free them from their lord’s control.  They revolted against the lords in the Peasant’s War of 1524-1525, but were brutally crushed.


Neither the pope nor Emperor Charles V could stop the Protestant movement.  In 1555, Protestant princes forced Charles to accept the peace of
Augsburg.  This treaty gave each Lutheran and Roman Catholic prince the right to force those under him to accept his religion.  It also established a division of church lands between the two religions.


During the mid-1500’s, the Roman Catholic
 Church began the Counter Reformation.  In this movement, the church won back many Protestants by peaceful means or by force.  By 1600, relatively few Protestants were left in Austria, Bavaria, and parts of Bohemia and the Rhineland.  The rest of Germany remained chiefly Lutheran.”[27]


“In 1618, Protestants in
Bohemia revolted against their Hapsburg ruler, who was a Roman Catholic.  But they were defeated in 1620.  The revolt became the start of the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648).  This series of religious and political wars eventually involved most European nations.  The Peace of Westphalia, which ended the Thirty Years’ War, declared that each German ruler could determine the official religion of the state.”[28]

 

While this was by far not the end of Catholicism in Austria it marked the breaking of the papacy’s grip on this country.  To the Catholics, tolerance of any other faiths was totally unacceptable.  Many of the local Austrian rulers continued to force Catholicism on their subjects until the nineteenth century, but the damage had been done.  As a nation, Austria had failed the Catholic Church.



Denmark

 

“In 1536, during the Reformation, King Christian III established Lutheranism as the official religion of Denmark.”[29]

 

The Reformation was most successful in Northern Europe, and during the first half of the 1500’s all three of the Scandinavian countries abandoned the papacy.



England

 

“Henry VIII inherited great wealth when he became king in 1509.  His father, Henry VII, had been a thrifty ruler.  Henry VIII was talented and popular, but he was also selfish and wasteful.  He enjoyed luxury, sports, good food, and music.


For about 20 years, Henry VIII let Thomas Cardinal Wolsey, archbishop of
York, manage the country.  But then, Henry wanted to divorce Catherine of Aragon, the first of his six wives.  The pope refused to give permission.  In 1529, Henry took away Wolsey’s authority and turned much power over to Thomas Cromwell, one of his advisers.  In 1534, Henry had Parliament pass a law declaring that the king, not the pope, was supreme head of the church in England.


Following Henry’s actions, English church leaders made changes in Roman Catholic
 services that gradually led to the formation of the Church of England.  A number of Henry’s subjects who opposed him were imprisoned or executed for treason.”[30]

 

From the time that the Church of England was established England found itself constantly at war with the Catholic powers, especially France.  The loss of England, which was a very powerful nation, was especially hurtful to the papacy.



France

We saw in great detail in chapter eleven how
France violently turned against the Catholic Church.  Christianity was replaced by the worship of the goddess of Reason.  Two popes were imprisoned, with the first dying in captivity.  Italy was invaded by the French Emperor Napoleon, and the Papal States were seized.  Of all the Catholic nations, France’s turn was the most violent and the most damaging to the papacy.  At that time France was the most powerful nation in the world, and to lose their support was devastating to the papacy.



Hungary

 

“The Protestant Reformation had begun in Germany in the 1500’s and gained many followers in Hungary.  Transylvania, in particular, had developed a tradition of religious freedom, which allowed Protestants and Unitarians as well as Catholics to establish churches.”[31]

 

Even before Hungary was swallowed up by the Ottoman Turks in 1526, the reformation had greatly weakened the hold of Catholicism on the country.  The simple fact that other faiths were allowed to operate unmolested shows that the government of Hungary was no longer in step with Rome.

 


Norway

 

“In 1536, Denmark declared Norway a Danish province and made Lutheranism the official Norwegian religion.”[32]

 

At the same time Norway lost its independence it was also made a Lutheran nation.  But even prior to this the spirit of reform had been working in the whole area.  If Denmark had not done it, then it would have happened on its own before too much longer.  The Reformation had found huge followings in that part of Europe, and its conquest of Norway was already a foregone conclusion.



Poland

 

Poland’s decline continued into the 1700’s.  In 1772, Austria, Prussia, and Russia took advantage of Poland’s weakness and partitioned Polish territory among themselves.  Austria seized land in southern Poland; Prussia took land in the west; and Russia took land in the east.  As a result, Poland lost about a third of its territory and half its population.


After the first partition, the Polish government adopted a series of reform measures to stop the country’s decay.  In 1791, a new constitution restored the hereditary monarchy.  But the reforms came too late.  In 1793,
Prussia and Russia seized additional territory in eastern and western Poland.  This second partition led to an uprising among Poles in 1794.  Polish forces under Thadeus Kosciusko fought Russian and Prussian troops, but were defeated.  Austria, Russia, and Prussia carried out the third partition of Poland in 1795, dividing the rest of the country among themselves.  After the third partition, Poland no longer existed as a nation.”[33]

 

Poland was not voluntarily removed from its support of the papacy, but as its territory was gobbled up by its neighbors, the people became part of nations which did not support the papacy.  So it was more or less by default that Poland ceased to support the papacy.

 


Portugal

 

“Until the early 1900’s, the Roman Catholic Church was, in effect, part of Portugal’s national government.  The church and state were separated in 1911.”[34]

 

Portugal is one of two nations which did not officially break with the papacy until the twentieth century.  Although Portugal remained a Catholic nation until 1911, it had tolerated other faiths for decades.  And besides this, Portugal had long before ceased to be a powerful nation which could offer much political or military support to the papacy.



Spain

 

“Napoleon Bonaparte seized control of France in 1799.  At first, Napoleon allied France with Spain.  But in 1808, French forces invaded Spain and quickly won control of the government.  Napoleon forced Ferdinand VII to give up the Spanish throne and named Joseph Bonaparte, his brother, king of Spain.


The Spanish people bitterly resisted the French occupation.  They struck back with a hit-and-run method of fighting called the guerrilla (little war), a word used ever since to describe such fighting.  This opposition led to the start of the Peninsular War later in 1808, when
Great Britain joined Spain and Portugal against France.  The French were driven from the Peninsula in 1813.


During the Peninsular War,
Spain’s Cortes—which had fled from Madrid to southern Spain—drew up a democratic constitution for the country.  The new constitution reduced the power of the Roman Catholic Church and increased individual rights and freedoms.”[35]

 

This marked a temporary end to the papacy’s power in Spain.  However, in 1851 Catholicism began another period of prominence in Spain which lasted more than a century.

 

“During most of the period from 1851 to 1978, Roman Catholicism was the state religion of Spain.  During that time, the government restricted the rights of non-Catholics in some ways.  For example, non-Catholics were not allowed to try to win new followers for their religions, and only marriage ceremonies performed by the Catholic Church were legal.  Spain adopted a new constitution in 1978.  Under provisions of the Constitution, Spain has no state religion, and people of all faiths are allowed complete freedom in religious matters.”[36]

 

In reality the support of the papacy by Spain ended in 1808.  After that time Spain was in no position to offer much political or military strength to the papacy.  So the real power ended in 1808, but the official end did not come until 1978.



Sweden

 

“Gustavus encouraged the followers of Martin Luther, the German religious reformer, to spread their ideas.  About 1540, the Lutheran religion became the state religion of Sweden.  Gustavus also increased the power of the throne and laid the foundations of the modern Swedish state.  He centralized the administration, dealt harshly with revolts, built an efficient army, and encouraged trade and industry.”[37]

 

Like Denmark and Norway, the Reformation took its toll on Catholicism in Sweden.  Sweden joined its Scandinavian counterparts in breaking away from Rome and establishing Protestantism as the official religion.


We should not get the impression that everything was rosy up to the point that each of the nations broke with
Rome.  The Reformation had thrown the entire continent into turmoil.  Several wars were fought between the supporters of Catholicism and Protestantism.  Cracks could be seen in the Catholic Empire long before it actually collapsed.

 

“The period from the end of the Thirty Years’ War in 1648 to the outbreak of the French Revolution (1789-1799) has been called the Revolt of the Catholic Kings.  The period was marked by quarrels between church and state, especially over an issue called Gallicanism.  At the same time, the church was disrupted from within by theological disputes, the most serious of which was over a religious movement known as Jansenism.  During this period, much of the hostility toward the church centered in France.


Quarrels between church and state affected the papacy’s relations with almost every Catholic
 country.  One of the major disputes involved Gallicanism—the idea that the authority of national churches should be increased at the expense of papal authority.


Gallicanism developed in
France, and the dispute over it became most critical there.  King Louis XIV and Pope Innocent XI quarreled over Louis’s attempts to increase his influence in French religious affairs.  The quarrel led many French clergymen to adopt doctrines that the papacy could not in conscience accept.  For example, some French clergymen believed that a general church council was superior to the pope.  Although the controversy died down in the 1690’s, the French clergy remained anti-Roman for many years.


Gallicanism, with its emphasis on nationalism, became popular in every European country ruled by a Catholic
 monarch.  During the late 1700’s, the Holy Roman emperor, Joseph II, tried to separate the Catholic church in Austria from Rome.  Joseph considered the church a department of state whose task was to promote morality.  He controlled all levels of the clergy and even interfered with the liturgy.  Rulers in Naples, Sardinia, Spain, and Venice followed Joseph’s example.


Jansenism arose in
France in the mid-1600’s.  This religious movement was based on the writings of Cornelius Jansen, bishop of Ypres, Belgium.  Jansen developed doctrines on divine grace that played down human freedom and denied that Christ died for all men.  The church attacked some Jansenist doctrines as heresy.


The movement tore Catholic
 France apart.  It divided many French bishops from Rome and even attracted the attention of Kings Louis XIV and Louis XV.  The Catholic philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal became a leading spokesman for Jansenism.  Three popes condemned Jansenism—Innocent X in 1653, Alexander VII in 1656, and Clement XI in 1713.  But their condemnation only increased the controversy.  Jansenism finally began to lose influence in the 1730’s.  But its harsh idea of God and emphasis on damnation still influence some Catholics today.


The Age of Reason was a period during which philosophers emphasized reason as the best method of learning truth.  The Age of Reason lasted from the late 1600’s to the late 1700’s.  During this time, many people attacked religion in general, and the Catholic
 Church in particular, which they claimed was unreasonable and filled with superstition.  They also believed that the Catholic clergy’s obedience to Rome violated France’s sovereignty.  The leaders of the period included such brilliant French intellectuals as Denis Diderot, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and Voltaire.


During the mid and late 1700’s, several nations banned the Jesuit order from their country and colonies. 
Portugal banned the Jesuits in 1759, France in 1764, and Spain in 1767.  In 1773, pressure from Catholic rulers helped force Pope Clement XIV to suppress the Jesuits in all countries.


The Jesuits were banned for several reasons.  Some Catholic
 rulers and churchmen were jealous of the order’s influence.  Some accused the Jesuits of accumulating too much power and wealth.  Gallicans opposed the order’s complete devotion to the pope and the church.”[38]

 

This passage shows us that in reality the Catholic kings had turned against the papacy long before Catholicism was officially renounced as the official religion of their respective countries.  For all practical purposes the ten nations had turned against the papacy by the time the French Revolution occurred.  This passage also sheds additional light on what we saw in chapter eleven concerning the French Revolution.  We can now see some of the underlying causes of the violent repression of Catholicism during that period.  This next passage brings the papacy’s loss of support into even clearer focus.

 

“The widespread hostility to religious organizations in the last half of the 18th century found virulent expression in the attitude of Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor and culminated in the sweeping anticlerical decrees of the French Revolutionary assembly.  Thenceforth, the governments of even traditionally Catholic countries displayed in their diplomacy an almost total lack of the deference to ecclesiastical authority that for centuries had characterized their conduct.”[39]

 

Here we clearly see pointed out to us the reversal in attitude of the European nations.  By the late eighteenth century they had all lost respect for the papacy.  Or to perhaps put it better, they had lost their fear of the papacy.  The Reformation had loosened the iron grip that Catholicism had on the European continent.  Kings could now oppose the pope without fearing for their political survival.  There was once a time when open opposition to the pope would probably lead to a sovereign’s overthrow.  But now, even though the pope would still vehemently protest any dissension, there was little he could do about it.  Neither the general population nor other kings were very likely to attempt to intervene on the pope’s behalf.  Thus his real power, which was coercion through fear, was gone even before the French Revolution.  In fact the astonishing events of the Revolution were the product of the pope’s demise not the cause of it.



17:17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.


God has always had a practice of using unrighteous men or nations to accomplish His goals.  At first this might seem to be improper, but a closer examination will show otherwise.  God is not forcing anyone to become evil or to do anything against their will.  He is simply directing their evil intents in a direction which will accomplish good.  God used the Assyrians and Babylonians to punish
Israel and Judah respectively.  He allowed His people to be carried out of their homes by these Gentile nations.  These nations were intent on conquest anyway, God simply decided how and when they would be allowed to accomplish their desires.  God was the orchestrator, but not the instigator, of their evil actions.  God simply uses the evil which is already present in someone’s heart to His advantage.


Here it says God “put in their hearts to fulfil his will.”  Certainly many of the things these men and their nations did were evil.  But God did not put the evil in their hearts.  He put the desire to accomplish certain things in their hearts.  The fact that they chose evil methods to accomplish these things was their own decision.  In this case God allowed these ten nations to join themselves to the papacy.  It was usually politically advantageous for a king to be in good favor with the pope.  Certainly these kings desired stability and security for themselves.  God simply showed them that this could be accomplished by aligning themselves with the papacy, and allowed this relationship to continue until such time as He desired to destroy the papacy.


Give their kingdom unto the beast” does not mean that these kings literally turned their thrones over to the papacy, but that they used the military, political, and economic muscle of their kingdoms to support the papacy.  They allowed the papacy to take advantage of their resources and power.


This arrangement was to continue “until the words of God shall be fulfilled.”  Here in Revelation we see the prediction of the breakup of this evil alliance.  God had long ago decided when all of this should come to an end.  Consequently, at the proper time, he caused the circumstances to be such that the Catholic
 kings would find it desirable to turn against the papacy.  Again He merely used the greed and lust for power that these kings already possessed to accomplish this.



17:18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.


This chapter closes with one more hint as to the identity of the woman.  She is none other than the
Roman Empire—carnal and spiritual.  From the city of Rome the great Empire ruled over the entire Western world for over two-thousand years in one form or another.  Nothing else can possibly fit this description.  From His headquarters in Rome, the pope—just like the emperors before him—enjoyed enormous power and influence over the Western world for over a millennium.  For a good part of that time it could literally be said that he “reigneth over the kings of the earth.”




 

 



[1] Davis, 1983, s.v. “purple.”

 

[2] Ibid., s.v. “scarlet.”

 

[3] Strong, 1982, s.v. “Greek #684.”

 

[4] World Book, 1985, s.v. “Rome.”

 

[5] Strong, 1982, s.v. “Greek #3641.”

 

[6] Funk & Wagnall’s, 1973, s.v. “Holy Roman Empire.”

 

[7] Strong, 1982, s.v. “Greek #5610.”

 

[8] World Book, 1985, s.v. “Europe.”

 

[9] Funk & Wagnall’s, 1973, s.v. “Austria.”

 

[10] World Book, 1985, s.v. “Denmark.”

 

[11] Ibid., s.v. “Finland.”

 

[12] Ibid., s.v. “France.”

 

[13] Ibid., s.v. “Germany.”

 

[14] Ibid., s.v. “England.”

 

[15] Ibid., s.v. “Hungary.”

 

[16] Ibid., s.v. “Italy.”

 

[17] Ibid., s.v. “Netherlands.”

 

[18] Ibid., s.v. “Norway.”

 

[19] Ibid., s.v. “Poland.”

 

[20] Ibid., s.v. “Poland.”

 

[21] Ibid., s.v. “Portugal.”

 

[22] Ibid., s.v. “Spain

 

[23] Ibid., s.v. “Sweden.”

 

[24] Ibid., s.v. “Roman Catholic Church.”

 

[25] Ibid., s.v. “Pope.”

 

[26] Lea, 1955, pp. 225-6.

 

[27] World Book, 1985, s.v. “Germany.”

 

[28] Ibid., s.v. “Austria.”

 

[29] Ibid., s.v. “Denmark.”

 

[30] Ibid., s.v. “England.”

 

[31] Ibid., s.v. “Hungary.”

[32] Ibid., s.v. “Norway.”

 

[33] Ibid., s.v. “Poland.”

 

[34] Ibid., s.v. “Portugal.”

 

[35] Ibid., s.v. “Spain.”

 

[36] Ibid., s.v. “Spain.”

 

[37] Ibid., s.v. “Sweden.”

 

[38] Ibid., s.v. “Roman Catholic Church.”

 

[39] Funk & Wagnall’s, 1973, s.v. “Roman Catholic Church.”